Earby & Coates vs Hurst Green & Whitewell

Side-by-side crime comparison: safety scores, categories and trends.

By:
A First Neighbourhood
    56/100
    Earby & Coates Lancashire Constabulary
    VS
    B Second Neighbourhood
      85/100
      Hurst Green & Whitewell Lancashire Constabulary

      Earby & Coates vs Hurst Green & Whitewell Results

      A
      56/100
      Average
      Earby & Coates
      Lancashire Constabulary
      318 crimes / 12m
      ↑4.3% trend
      25% resolved
      View full statistics
      VS
      B
      85/100
      Very Safe
      Hurst Green & Whitewell
      Lancashire Constabulary
      0 crimes / 12m
      ↓0% trend
      0% resolved
      View full statistics

      Key Statistics (last 12 months)

      A Earby & Coates
      B Hurst Green & Whitewell
      Safety Score
      56/100 Average
      85/100 Very Safe
      Total Crimes
      318
      0
      Crimes (prev 12 months)
      305
      0
      Crime Trend (vs same month last year)
      ↑4.3%
      ↓0%
      Resolution Rate ?
      25%
      0%

      Crime by Category (last 12 months)

      Number of crimes per category — lower is better

      A Earby & Coates
      B Hurst Green & Whitewell
      Violent Crime
      141 ↑33%
      0
      Anti-Social Behaviour
      88 ↓11%
      0
      Other Theft
      20 ↑18%
      0
      Vehicle Crime
      16 ↓16%
      0
      Burglary
      6 ↓67%
      0
      Criminal Damage & Arson
      18 ↑50%
      0
      Drugs
      2 ↑100%
      0
      Public Order
      18 ↑13%
      0
      Shoplifting
      1 ↓50%
      0
      Bicycle Theft
      1
      0
      Other Crime
      7 ↓50%
      0
      Overall Verdict
      B Hurst Green & Whitewell is the safer choice — scoring 85/100 vs 56/100 and winning 3 out of 4 key metrics.
      3/4 metrics won
      Compare a different area? Search any two UK neighbourhoods or cities side-by-side
      Start a New Comparison

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Earby & Coates safer than Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      Earby & Coates has a safety score of 56/100 (Average) and recorded 318 crimes in the last 12 months. Hurst Green & Whitewell has a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe) with 0 crimes. Hurst Green & Whitewell scores higher on the CrimeRadar safety index.

      What is the crime trend in Earby & Coates vs Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      Earby & Coates shows a year-on-year crime trend of +4.3% — meaning total crimes rose compared to the same period the prior year. Hurst Green & Whitewell shows 0% (falling). A downward trend is a positive sign for an area.

      What types of crime are most common in Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      In Earby & Coates, the most recorded crime category over the last 12 months is Violent Crime (141 incidents). In Hurst Green & Whitewell, it is miscellaneous (0 incidents). The full breakdown by category is shown in the chart above.

      How does anti-social behaviour compare between Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      Earby & Coates recorded 88 anti-social behaviour incidents in the last 12 months, while Hurst Green & Whitewell recorded 0. Anti-social behaviour includes rowdiness, nuisance and disorder that disrupts daily life but may not result in a criminal charge.

      How do violent crime levels compare in Earby & Coates vs Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      Violent crime in Earby & Coates totalled 141 incidents over the last 12 months, compared to 0 in Hurst Green & Whitewell. Violent crime includes assault with and without injury, harassment, and public order offences.

      How many crimes were recorded in Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell in the previous year?

      In the 12 months prior to the most recent period, Earby & Coates recorded 305 crimes (now 318, a change of +4.3%). Hurst Green & Whitewell recorded 0 crimes previously (now 0, 0%).

      What is the resolution rate for crimes in Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      The resolution rate is the percentage of recorded crimes that resulted in a formal outcome — such as a charge, caution, penalty notice, or community resolution. Earby & Coates has a resolution rate of 25% and Hurst Green & Whitewell has 0%. A higher rate indicates police are more frequently resolving reported crimes in that area.

      Which police force covers Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      Earby & Coates falls within the Lancashire Constabulary boundary. Hurst Green & Whitewell is covered by Lancashire Constabulary. Each force operates independently and publishes crime data through the national UK Police API.

      What data is used to compare Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell?

      CrimeRadar uses 36 months of official recorded crime data from the UK Police API, updated each month. The safety score combines crime volume relative to the force average, year-on-year trend direction, and resolution rate. All figures are based on crimes recorded within each police-defined neighbourhood boundary.

      Can I see Earby & Coates or Hurst Green & Whitewell on a crime map?

      Yes — CrimeRadar has individual crime map pages for both Earby & Coates and Hurst Green & Whitewell. You can view interactive maps, monthly trends and hotspot locations by visiting each neighbourhood's full statistics page linked above.

      City rankings are based on official police force data areas, which cover cities and surrounding regions.