Farnham, Baylis and Stoke vs Hungerford and Lambourn District

Side-by-side crime comparison: safety scores, categories and trends.

By:
A First Neighbourhood
    7/100
    Farnham, Baylis and Stoke Thames Valley Police
    VS
    B Second Neighbourhood
      7/100
      Hungerford and Lambourn District Thames Valley Police

      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke vs Hungerford and Lambourn District Results

      A
      7/100
      High Crime
      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke
      Thames Valley Police
      2,664 crimes / 12m
      ↑2.7% trend
      26.8% resolved
      View full statistics
      VS
      B
      7/100
      High Crime
      Hungerford and Lambourn District
      Thames Valley Police
      862 crimes / 12m
      ↓4.9% trend
      10.2% resolved
      View full statistics

      Key Statistics (last 12 months)

      A Farnham, Baylis and Stoke
      B Hungerford and Lambourn District
      Safety Score
      7/100 High Crime
      7/100 High Crime
      Total Crimes
      2,664
      862
      Crimes (prev 12 months)
      2,593
      906
      Crime Trend (vs same month last year)
      ↑2.7%
      ↓4.9%
      Resolution Rate ?
      26.8%
      10.2%

      Crime by Category (last 12 months)

      Number of crimes per category — lower is better

      A Farnham, Baylis and Stoke
      B Hungerford and Lambourn District
      Violent Crime
      1,076 ↑3%
      366 ↓4%
      Anti-Social Behaviour
      191 ↑5%
      91 ↑30%
      Other Theft
      203 ↑4%
      75 ↑1%
      Vehicle Crime
      282 ↑15%
      41 ↓20%
      Burglary
      60 ↓40%
      52 ↓22%
      Criminal Damage & Arson
      159 ↑7%
      78 ↓14%
      Drugs
      63 ↑19%
      24 ↓25%
      Public Order
      211 ↑23%
      75 ↓1%
      Robbery
      41 ↑24%
      5 ↑67%
      Shoplifting
      262 ↑4%
      14 ↓30%
      Theft from Person
      26 ↓28%
      3 ↓57%
      Bicycle Theft
      30 ↓62%
      3 ↑0%
      Possession of Weapons
      11 ↓54%
      6 ↑50%
      Other Crime
      49 ↑69%
      29 ↑7%
      Overall Verdict
      B Hungerford and Lambourn District is the safer choice — scoring 7/100 vs 7/100 and winning 2 out of 4 key metrics.
      2/4 metrics won
      Compare a different area? Search any two UK neighbourhoods or cities side-by-side
      Start a New Comparison

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Farnham, Baylis and Stoke safer than Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke has a safety score of 7/100 (High Crime) and recorded 2,664 crimes in the last 12 months. Hungerford and Lambourn District has a safety score of 7/100 (High Crime) with 862 crimes. Both areas score equally on the safety index.

      What is the crime trend in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke vs Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke shows a year-on-year crime trend of +2.7% — meaning total crimes rose compared to the same period the prior year. Hungerford and Lambourn District shows -4.9% (falling). A downward trend is a positive sign for an area.

      What types of crime are most common in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      In Farnham, Baylis and Stoke, the most recorded crime category over the last 12 months is Violent Crime (1,076 incidents). In Hungerford and Lambourn District, it is Violent Crime (366 incidents). The full breakdown by category is shown in the chart above.

      How does anti-social behaviour compare between Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke recorded 191 anti-social behaviour incidents in the last 12 months, while Hungerford and Lambourn District recorded 91. Anti-social behaviour includes rowdiness, nuisance and disorder that disrupts daily life but may not result in a criminal charge.

      How do violent crime levels compare in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke vs Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      Violent crime in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke totalled 1,076 incidents over the last 12 months, compared to 366 in Hungerford and Lambourn District. Violent crime includes assault with and without injury, harassment, and public order offences.

      How many crimes were recorded in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District in the previous year?

      In the 12 months prior to the most recent period, Farnham, Baylis and Stoke recorded 2,593 crimes (now 2,664, a change of +2.7%). Hungerford and Lambourn District recorded 906 crimes previously (now 862, -4.9%).

      What is the resolution rate for crimes in Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      The resolution rate is the percentage of recorded crimes that resulted in a formal outcome — such as a charge, caution, penalty notice, or community resolution. Farnham, Baylis and Stoke has a resolution rate of 26.8% and Hungerford and Lambourn District has 10.2%. A higher rate indicates police are more frequently resolving reported crimes in that area.

      Which police force covers Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      Farnham, Baylis and Stoke falls within the Thames Valley Police boundary. Hungerford and Lambourn District is covered by Thames Valley Police. Each force operates independently and publishes crime data through the national UK Police API.

      What data is used to compare Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District?

      CrimeRadar uses 36 months of official recorded crime data from the UK Police API, updated each month. The safety score combines crime volume relative to the force average, year-on-year trend direction, and resolution rate. All figures are based on crimes recorded within each police-defined neighbourhood boundary.

      Can I see Farnham, Baylis and Stoke or Hungerford and Lambourn District on a crime map?

      Yes — CrimeRadar has individual crime map pages for both Farnham, Baylis and Stoke and Hungerford and Lambourn District. You can view interactive maps, monthly trends and hotspot locations by visiting each neighbourhood's full statistics page linked above.

      City rankings are based on official police force data areas, which cover cities and surrounding regions.